ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Sparse multitask group Lasso for genome-wide association studies.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A critical hurdle in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) involves population stratification, wherein differences in allele frequencies among subpopulations within samples are influenced by distinct ancestry. This stratification implies that risk variants may be distinct across populations with different allele frequencies. This study introduces Sparse Multitask Group Lasso (SMuGLasso) to tackle this challenge. SMuGLasso is based on MuGLasso, which formulates this problem using a multitask group lasso framework in which tasks are subpopulations, and groups are population-specific Linkage-Disequilibrium (LD)-groups of strongly correlated Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). The novelty in SMuGLasso is the incorporation of an additional [Formula: see text]-norm regularization for the selection of population-specific genetic variants. As MuGLasso, SMuGLasso uses a stability selection procedure to improve robustness and gap-safe screening rules for computational efficiency. We evaluate MuGLasso and SMuGLasso on simulated data sets as well as on a case-control breast cancer data set and a quantitative GWAS in Arabidopsis thaliana. We show that SMuGLasso is well suited to addressing linkage disequilibrium and population stratification in GWAS data, and show the superiority of SMuGLasso over MuGLasso in identifying population-specific SNPs. On real data, we confirm the relevance of the identified loci through pathway and network analysis, and observe that the findings of SMuGLasso are more consistent with the literature than those of MuGLasso. All in all, SMuGLasso is a promising tool for analyzing GWAS data and furthering our understanding of population-specific biological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.