Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938920›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Low-carbon optimal scheduling of integrated energy systems based on multi-strategy ameliorated goose algorithm and green certificate-carbon trading coordination.

Chengcheng Ding, Yun Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chengcheng DingSchool of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Yun ZhuSchool of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.ORCID 0009-0000-1131-8389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integrated energy systems (IES) in China face a dual challenge under the "dual-carbon" targets: maximizing renewable energy utilization while minimizing carbon emissions. Traditional tiered carbon markets often lack the flexibility to dynamically incentivize low-carbon operation. To address this, a coordinated framework is proposed, integrating a dynamic carbon emission trading (CET) mechanism with green certificate trading (GCT) and a Multi-Strategy Ameliorated Goose Optimization (MSAGOOSE) algorithm. The GCT-CET mechanism introduces exponential reward-penalty coefficients based on real-time renewable consumption rates, enabling adaptive carbon pricing. MSAGOOSE combines adaptive parameter adjustment, multimodal distribution-guided exploration, and population-aware reverse learning to improve optimization robustness in high-dimensional, nonlinear scheduling problems. Benchmark evaluations on CEC2017 and CEC2022 show that MSAGOOSE achieves an order-of-magnitude improvement in accuracy over seven state-of-the-art algorithms. In a 24-hour IES scheduling case in Anhui Province, the proposed method reduces carbon emissions by 27.3% (5,121 kg/d), increases renewable energy share to 88%, and cuts operating costs by 24.8% (6,151 CNY/d). Parametric analysis further confirms the framework's effectiveness in balancing economic and environmental goals under decentralized energy scenarios. This study presents a policy-algorithm co-design paradigm that offers both theoretical and practical support for low-carbon IES transitions, enabling scalable, flexible, and economically viable scheduling strategies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCarbonRenewable EnergyChinaCarbon

Identifiers

PMID40938920
PMCPMC12431214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.