ArticlePloS one2025
Integration of wearable devices and artificial intelligence in Alzheimer's disease: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to rise, and predictive models combining artificial intelligence (AI) with wearable devices offer a new approach for its detection and diagnosis. Existing reviews remain focused on traditional biomarkers, making it necessary to supplement the evidence in this field, particularly given the rapid advancements in wearable and AI technologies. The scoping review protocol aims to systematically evaluate AI-based predictive models using wearable devices for AD, with a focus on their measurement outcomes and model development processes. The review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley framework and incorporate PRISMA-ScR guidelines. This study will search multiple databases, including Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, covering relevant gray literature. The quality of the included studies will be rigorously assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) and Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklists. Two independent reviewers will conduct title and abstract screening, retrieve and assess full-text evidence sources, and extract data. The results will be narratively synthesized and presented in tables and figures. The knowledge gained from this review is expected to provide systematic evidence supporting AI-based predictive models that combine wearable devices for AD, potentially offering insights into model construction details such as data collection and external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.