Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938899›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Resolution of physics and deep learning-based protein engineering filters: A case study with a lipase for industrial substrate hydrolysis.

Spencer Gardiner, Peter Dollinger, Filip Kovacic, Jörg Pietruszka, Daniel H Ess, Karl-Erich Jaeger, Gunnar F Schröder, Dennis Della Corte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Spencer GardinerDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Peter DollingerInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Jülich, Germany.
Filip KovacicInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Jülich, Germany.
Jörg PietruszkaInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Daniel H EssDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Karl-Erich JaegerInstitute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Jülich, Germany.
Gunnar F SchröderInstitute of Complex Systems, Structural Biochemistry (ICS-6), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Dennis Della CorteDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-9724

Funding

Engineering Enzymes for Improved Stability and Retained Function via Rapid Design-Build-Test-Learn Cycles integrating AI/Physics based predictions with Cell-free Protein Synthesis Experimental TestingR15GM155803 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI DELLA CORTE, DENNIS · 2024 to 2024
$449k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM155803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational enzyme design remains a powerful yet imperfect tool for optimizing biocatalysts, especially when targeting non-natural substrates. Using design tools we investigated Pseudomonas aeruginosa LipA, a lipase with a flexible lid domain crucial for substrate binding and turnover, aiming to enhance its hydrolysis of the industrially relevant substrate Roche ester. We generated an initial set of single-point mutations based on structural proximity to the active site and evaluated their effects using a computational pipeline integrating molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, density functional theory (DFT) calculations, and ensemble-based energy scoring. While we identified several active variants, attempts to rank them by activity using structural features, such as hydrogen bond formation or residue flexibility, failed. Deep learning models, applied post hoc for structural analysis via AlphaFold3, produced nearly identical active site geometries across variants, irrespective of activity. Reaction pathway analysis revealed energy barriers varying by 5-15 kcal/mol depending on substrate conformation, with the nucleophile addition step consistently rate-limiting. However, these small energetic shifts, likely critical for incremental activity changes, were indistinguishable by current computational or deep learning methods. Our results highlight the limitations of existing approaches in resolving subtle functional differences and underscore the need for improved benchmarks, reactive force fields, and more sensitive ranking metrics. Advancing these areas will be essential for designing enzymes with gradual, evolution-like activity improvements and for bridging the gap between structural prediction and catalytic function.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsDeep LearningLipaseProtein EngineeringCatalytic DomainHydrolysisMolecular Dynamics SimulationPseudomonas aeruginosaSubstrate SpecificityBacterial ProteinsLipase

Identifiers

PMID40938899
PMCPMC12431253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.