ArticlePloS one2025
Mechanisms that link circadian preference to problematic smartphone and social media use in young adults.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Central and Bridge Symptoms of Internet Gaming Disorder, Social Jet Lag, and Insomnia Among College Students: Cross-Sectional Network Analysis.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Article
- Computational analysis and automated classification of eating disorder discourse on Twitter's EDTWT community.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Association between problematic smartphone use, sleep quality, and chronotype among Sudanese medical students during armed conflict: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Negative life events and depression: a moderated mediation model of mobile phone addiction and chronotype among medical undergraduate students in North China.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evening-types are at higher risk of problematic smartphone use and addiction to social media, but little is known about the possible mediating factors. Given the rising prevalence and broad negative impacts of smartphone and social media addiction, these factors require identification. Young adults (N = 407) aged 18-25, with an average age of 19.8 years, completed a battery of validated measures online. We tested mental health (anxiety and depression symptoms), loneliness, and poorer sleep quality as potential mediators in the relationships between eveningness and problematic smartphone use and social media addiction. As expected, evening types had higher prevalence of problematic smartphone use and social media addiction. Eveningness was also associated with higher anxiety and depression symptoms, loneliness, and poorer sleep quality. Two separate parallel mediation analyses were then conducted, with these three factors entered simultaneously as mediators. For problematic smartphone use, a partial mediation occurred, with loneliness as the significant mediating variable. For social media addiction, both loneliness and anxiety were significant mediators, and a full mediation was found. These important findings point to loneliness and anxiety as crucial explanatory variables for problematic technology use in young adults, suggesting that young adult evening types resort to smartphone/social media use as a dysfunctional coping strategy for loneliness and anxiety. Given the prevalence of problematic smartphone use and social media addiction amongst young people worldwide, and their wide-ranging negative impacts, this has important implications for prevention and intervention strategies to enhance young adults' mental health, functioning, and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.