ArticleAnnals of surgery2025
Patient and Caregiver Experiences with Surgical Decision-Making in the Context of Dementia.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinician Considerations Regarding Surgical Decision-Making in the Context of Dementia.JAMA surgery · 2026Article
- Long-Term Cognitive and Functional Outcomes of Anesthesia and Surgery in Patients with Dementia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Racial and Sex Differences in Postoperative Mortality Between Patients With Versus Without Dementia.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Practice, Policy, and Research Recommendations to Improve Decision-Making about Surgery for People Living with Dementia: A Delphi Panel Consensus.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore patient and caregiver experiences of surgical decision-making for patients living with dementia (PLWD). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: PLWD face heightened risks of poor surgical outcomes. For PLWD, surgical decisions are often made in collaboration with caregivers (family or close others who support the PLWD), yet there is limited research examining PLWD and caregiver experiences of surgical decision-making.
methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews with nationally recruited PLWD (n=11) and caregivers (n=36) facing a surgical decision within the past two years. Interviews explored surgical decision-making experiences. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we coded the transcribed interview data and developed themes related to decision-making priorities, strategies, experiences, and satisfaction.
resultsThe following themes were identified: (1) PLWD and caregivers prioritized quality-of-life outcomes, (2) They struggled to anticipate benefits and risks of treatment options for the PLWD, (3) Caregivers felt a heavy burden to make the "right" decision when PLWD were unable to participate in decision-making, and (4) Decisional regret stemmed from a lack of alignment between the decision and what the caregiver felt the PLWD would have wanted.
conclusionsPLWD and caregivers navigated fraught surgical decisions and sought the 'right' balance between potential cognitive and functional tradeoffs of surgical and non-surgical options. Findings highlight the need for targeted decisional support for PLWD as well as caregivers who face decision-making on behalf of PLWD. Results inform potential mechanisms for improving surgical decision-making quality and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.