Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04982315 (Pragmatic Trial of Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pragmatic Trial of Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for acupuncture response in community-dwelling patients with chronic low back pain: a retrospective cohort study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) collaborative care involving acupuncture for axial spondyloarthritis: 6-week exploratory results of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- What's the science behind acupuncture?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Trends in acupuncture billing by a large commercial insurer.The American journal of managed care · 2026Article
- Dose-Response Relationship Between Acupuncture Parameters and Pain Reduction in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Acupotomy Combined with Celecoxib and Zhenggu Shenjin Capsules for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Different Acupuncture Therapies for Postoperative Residual Pain Following PKP/PVP for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The study was carried out to inform Medicare acupuncture coverage decisions addressing the gap in evidence on acupuncture effectiveness, specifically for older adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Objective: To determine the effectiveness of standard acupuncture (SA) or SA plus maintenance (enhanced acupuncture [EA]) to improve CLBP-related disability relative to usual medical care (UMC) at 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multisite, 3-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial of older adults with CLBP collected data from 4 US health care systems in 3 geographic areas and compared SA and EA treatment with UMC only. Study enrollment was conducted from August 12, 2021, to October 27, 2022; follow-up concluded on November 7, 2023. Interventions: Both SA (8-15 treatment sessions over 12 weeks plus UMC) and EA (SA plus 4-6 maintenance sessions during the next 12 weeks) were provided by experienced, community-based licensed acupuncturists. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to the 3 groups. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CLBP-related disability measured by a baseline-to-6-month change in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity and the percentage of participants with clinically meaningful (≥30%) improvements. Results: The trial identified 800 individuals who were randomized to 3 groups (mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.0] years; 496 females [62.0%]). At 6 months, RMDQ change scores were significantly better in both the SA and EA groups compared with the UMC only group (SA vs UMC: adjusted mean difference, -1.0 [95% CI, -1.9 to -0.1] and EA vs UMC: adjusted mean difference, -1.5 [95% CI, -2.5 to -0.6]). SA and EA change scores did not differ significantly from one another. The relative benefit of acupuncture compared with UMC on disability persisted at 12 months. Pain intensity exhibited a relative benefit of EA over SA at 6 months, and both acupuncture groups had significant improvement over UMC. The adjusted percentage with clinically meaningful improvements in RMDQ at 6 months was greater for SA (39.1% [95% CI, 33.1%-46.1%]; adjusted relative risk, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.70]) and for EA (43.8% [95% CI, 38.0%-50.4%]; adjusted relative risk, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.19-1.86]) compared with UMC (29.4% [95% CI, 24.3%-35.5%]) and persisted at 12 months. Rates of serious adverse events were low and similar among groups, with less than 1% that was possibly acupuncture-intervention related. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this randomized clinical trial of older adults with CLBP suggest that acupuncture needling provided greater improvements in back pain-related disability at 6 months and at 12 months compared with UMC alone. These findings support acupuncture needling as an effective and safe treatment option for older adults with CLBP. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04982315.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.