Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938602›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lynn L DeBar, Robert D Wellman, Morgan Justice, Andrew L Avins, Matthew Beyrouty, Carolyn M Eng, Patricia M Herman, Arya Nielsen, Alice Pressman, Katie L Stone and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04982315 (Pragmatic Trial of Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04982315 nacompletednot on this map

Pragmatic Trial of Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2021 to 2024Enrolled807ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsStandard Acupuncture, Enhanced Acupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What's the science behind acupuncture?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Trends in acupuncture billing by a large commercial insurer.The American journal of managed care · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lynn L DeBarKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Robert D WellmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Morgan JusticeKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Andrew L AvinsDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Matthew BeyroutyThe Institute for Family Health, New York, New York.
Carolyn M EngKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Patricia M HermanRAND, Santa Monica, California.
Arya NielsenThe Institute for Family Health, New York, New York.
Alice PressmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Katie L StoneDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Raymond Y TeetsThe Institute for Family Health, New York, New York.
Andrea J CookKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
Pragmatic Trial of Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older AdultsUH3AT010739 · NCCIH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI COOK, ANDREA JEAN, DEBAR, LYNN L. · 2020 to 2022
$9.1M
HEAL Collaboratory Resource Coordinating Center (PRISM) (U24): Bioethics SupplementU24AT010961 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, LESLEY H, HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN · 2019 to 2021
$6.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT010961NCCIH NIH HHS UH3 AT010739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The study was carried out to inform Medicare acupuncture coverage decisions addressing the gap in evidence on acupuncture effectiveness, specifically for older adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Objective: To determine the effectiveness of standard acupuncture (SA) or SA plus maintenance (enhanced acupuncture [EA]) to improve CLBP-related disability relative to usual medical care (UMC) at 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multisite, 3-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial of older adults with CLBP collected data from 4 US health care systems in 3 geographic areas and compared SA and EA treatment with UMC only. Study enrollment was conducted from August 12, 2021, to October 27, 2022; follow-up concluded on November 7, 2023. Interventions: Both SA (8-15 treatment sessions over 12 weeks plus UMC) and EA (SA plus 4-6 maintenance sessions during the next 12 weeks) were provided by experienced, community-based licensed acupuncturists. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to the 3 groups. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CLBP-related disability measured by a baseline-to-6-month change in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity and the percentage of participants with clinically meaningful (≥30%) improvements. Results: The trial identified 800 individuals who were randomized to 3 groups (mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.0] years; 496 females [62.0%]). At 6 months, RMDQ change scores were significantly better in both the SA and EA groups compared with the UMC only group (SA vs UMC: adjusted mean difference, -1.0 [95% CI, -1.9 to -0.1] and EA vs UMC: adjusted mean difference, -1.5 [95% CI, -2.5 to -0.6]). SA and EA change scores did not differ significantly from one another. The relative benefit of acupuncture compared with UMC on disability persisted at 12 months. Pain intensity exhibited a relative benefit of EA over SA at 6 months, and both acupuncture groups had significant improvement over UMC. The adjusted percentage with clinically meaningful improvements in RMDQ at 6 months was greater for SA (39.1% [95% CI, 33.1%-46.1%]; adjusted relative risk, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.70]) and for EA (43.8% [95% CI, 38.0%-50.4%]; adjusted relative risk, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.19-1.86]) compared with UMC (29.4% [95% CI, 24.3%-35.5%]) and persisted at 12 months. Rates of serious adverse events were low and similar among groups, with less than 1% that was possibly acupuncture-intervention related. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this randomized clinical trial of older adults with CLBP suggest that acupuncture needling provided greater improvements in back pain-related disability at 6 months and at 12 months compared with UMC alone. These findings support acupuncture needling as an effective and safe treatment option for older adults with CLBP. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04982315.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyChronic PainLow Back PainAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40938602
PMCPMC12432643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.