Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938558›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2025

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma (ESMMO): a multicenter, phase II clinical trial.

Nut Koonrungsesomboon, Pimpisa Teeyakasem, Nahathai Dukaew, Nutnicha Sirikaew, Patcharawadee Thongkumkoon, Petlada Yongpitakwattana, Viraporn Thepbundit, Parunya Chaiyawat, Jeerawan Klangjorhor, Chotiwit Sakuludomkan and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nut KoonrungsesomboonDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. nkoonrung@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4649-597X
Pimpisa TeeyakasemCenter of Multidisciplinary Technologies for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Nahathai DukaewDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Nutnicha SirikaewCenter of Multidisciplinary Technologies for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Patcharawadee ThongkumkoonCenter of Multidisciplinary Technologies for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Petlada YongpitakwattanaCenter of Multidisciplinary Technologies for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Viraporn ThepbunditCenter of Multidisciplinary Technologies for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Parunya ChaiyawatCenter of Multidisciplinary Technologies for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Jeerawan KlangjorhorCenter of Multidisciplinary Technologies for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Chotiwit SakuludomkanDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Chaiyut CharoentumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Busyamas ChewaskuyongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Lalita SathitsamitphongDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Piya KiatiseviInstitute of Orthopaedics, Lerdsin Hospital, Bangkok, 10500, Thailand.
Patrapim SunpaweravongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Chirawadee SathitruangsakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Dumnoensun PruksakornCenter of Multidisciplinary Technologies for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. dumnoensun.p@cmu.ac.th.

Funding

National Science and Technology Development Agency P - 18-51991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteosarcoma is a prevalent and aggressive bone malignancy primarily affecting young adults. Despite advances in standard treatment, the 5-year survival rate remains low, highlighting the need for new chemotherapy options. Mycophenolate mofetil, an immunosuppressant used post-transplant, has shown promising preclinical anticancer effects in osteosarcoma, warranting further investigation for potential repurpose in humans.

methodsWe conducted this proof-of-concept phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma. Patients received 3-5 g/day mycophenolate mofetil for four 28-day cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate, safety, pharmacokinetics, pain score, and quality of life.

resultsFifteen patients were enrolled. Due to intolerable toxicity at higher doses, most patients received 3 g/day of mycophenolate mofetil. At 16 weeks, the PFS rate was 40%, with only one patient (6.7%) achieving stable disease. Median PFS and OS were 70 and 301 days, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anemia and fatigue, each occurring in 20% of patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed high interindividual variability.

conclusionAlthough mycophenolate mofetil at 3 g/day was well tolerated, it did not meet expectations for anticancer efficacy in patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma. This study should be considered a negative trial. Further research is needed to explore the therapeutic role of mycophenolate mofetil through alternative strategies or identify more effective interventions for osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsMycophenolic AcidOsteosarcomaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProgression-Free SurvivalProof of Concept StudyQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultMycophenolic AcidAnticancerClinical trialMycophenolate mofetilMycophenolic acidOsteosarcoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.