ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Assessing calcification effects in TEVAR procedures: a computational analysis.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedure is sometimes discouraged from clinical guidelines in the presence of calcifications and thrombus along the sealing zones. This computational study aims to understand which is the effect of calcification on stent graft displacement after TEVAR procedure, simulated in a patient-specific anatomy with a penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU).A patient-specific anatomy without calcification is taken as reference, and four models with idealized calcifications positioned in different regions and with different material properties are analyzed. Opening area, von Mises stresses and contact pressures are evaluated to provide a reliable comparison between the calcified (Ca) and the non-calcified models (noCa), and among the calcified models themselves.Comparing qualitatively the Ca and noCa models, no particular changes in the stent graft apposition are observed. In addition, in the Ca models the opening area results lower with respect to the noCa models, but no significant differences are observed among the Ca models. Regarding the von Mises stresses, it seems that the calcifications act as load-bearing structures, absorbing the stresses and reducing them on the aorta. Decreasing the Young modulus of the calcifications, this effect is reduced. Higher contact pressures are observed when the highest Young's modulus of calcification is adopted, with all Ca models having greater pressures than the noCa model.From this analysis, the stent graft seems to be positioned correctly inside the aorta, even in the presence of calcifications. In this setting, the calcifications seem to reduce the stresses on the aorta, thus reducing the likelihood of aneurysm rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.