ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Self-study tool for integrating health equity into Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiatives.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health in All Policies in Sectoral Legislation: A Content Analysis of Selected Laws in the Republic of Srpska.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
settingSetting. Health system leaders in Canada recognise that quality improvement alone cannot address health inequities. Intersectoral action, which involves coordination and collaboration across public, private, and third-sector organisations, can improve the distribution of social determinants of health (SDOH) and thereby, health equity. While Health in All Policies (HiAP) promotes this approach, critiques and empirical data highlight implementation gaps over whether health equity is actually being improved. The potential for HiAP initiatives to reduce health inequities can be strengthened by paying greater attention to how these interventions are designed, implemented, and evaluated.
interventionWe developed and pilot tested a self-study tool that helps organisations learn and reflect on how health equity can be targeted in intersectoral initiatives, including HiAP. This is not the only tool that can be used to consider ways to integrate health equity into intersectoral action; however, it is the first one designed for HiAP initiatives specifically. OUTCOMES: The self-study tool asks the user to reflect on a series of health equity concepts to raise awareness about opportunities to better integrate health equity into the design, implementation, and evaluation of intersectoral initiatives. IMPLICATIONS: The survey and appendix can fill in the gaps of other tools meant to support intersectoral action for health by focusing on ways to strengthen the health equity potential of initiatives. Users can apply the tool prospectively and retrospectively to explicitly target specific criteria to improve how their interventions focus on and potentially address health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.