ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Using Latent Profile Analysis to Identify Stigma Typologies Among a Sample of Women Living with HIV and Who Inject Drugs in Ukraine.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Women living with HIV (WLWH) who inject drugs experience intersecting forms of stigma that adversely impact care engagement and health outcomes. We used latent profile analysis to identify typologies of intersecting stigma among WLWH who inject drugs and examined individual, social, and health care-related factors associated with these typologies. Surveys were collected from WLWH in Ukraine (n = 297) between 2019 and 2020. Six scales for internalized and enacted stigma related to HIV and drug use were used, then multinomial logistic regression assessed factors associated with profile membership. Four profiles emerged: "low stigma" (reference group, estimated 32.3% of the sample), "internalized stigma only" (49.2%), "social network stigma" (12.1%), and "provider stigma" (6.4%). Some degree of internalized stigma for both HIV and drug use was present across all profiles, including the reference group. Drug use stigma scores were generally higher than those for HIV. After adjusting for age, income, and time since HIV diagnosis, participants engaged in HIV care had significantly lower odds of being in the "provider stigma" profile compared to the reference group (aOR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.86, p < 0.05), while a higher frequency of injection drug use had greater association with the "provider stigma" profile (aOR = 8.26, 95% CI: 1.55-44.16, p < 0.05). History of intimate partner violence was associated with the "internalized stigma only" (aOR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.51-6.82, p < 0.01) and "social network stigma" (aOR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.15-10.22, p < 0.05) profiles. These findings illustrate the value of latent profile analysis in understanding intersectional stigma and highlight the need for tailored interventions to address stigma among WLWH who inject drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40938491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.