ArticleDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Arnold Rikli and the "atmospheric cure"].
Article in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the second half of the 19th century, the Swiss autodidact Arnold Rikli developed his concept of the "atmospheric cure" as part of naturopathic efforts and implemented it in Veldes (today Bled, Slovenia).
objectiveWhat concepts did Riki develop and what indications did he see. How is this to be assessed from today's perspective? MATERIALS AND
methodsRikli's own writings are used to evaluate his "light air cure" as a form of phototherapy. Secondary literature is used to evaluate Rikli's status in his time as well as contradictions and ambivalences from a modern perspective.
resultsFor Rikli, the central linchpin of naturopathy is the "light air cure", which he combined with hydrotherapy, physical exercise, phytotherapy, and vegetable nutrition. He was very active as a writer with 53 publications in books and magazines and thus gained a great deal of fame. His views were not without controversy. He appeared as an outspoken opponent of conventional medicine and was a declared opponent of vaccination. His merit was to bring "light therapy" into the focus of attention. In the years that followed, it was increasingly scientifically processed and used in conventional medicine, for example, in the treatment of rickets and tuberculosis. Since 1989, the Arnold Rikli Prize for outstanding leadership in the field of photobiology has been awarded in memory of the "father of phototherapy".
conclusionAs a nonphysician, Rikli popularized phototherapy as part of a holistic treatment concept in the second half of the 19th century and at the beginning of the 20th century. He eventually helped it gain recognition in conventional medicine, which initially focused on its use in nonpulmonary tuberculosis. Rikli's partly pseudoscientific justifications of his treatment methods have hindered their acceptance in medicine. Nevertheless, he is also a pioneer of phototherapy from a modern point of view and developed his own hydrotherapeutic approaches. His activities were also aimed at the development of tourism in the region around Bled. The combination of physical medicine with physical exercise, vegetable nutrition and phytotherapy seems almost modern compared to the spa medicine of its time. This is also recognized by the Arnold Rikli Prize for Photobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40938434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.