SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
A meta-analytic insight into predictors and consequences of intra-procedural rupture in unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intra-procedural rupture (IPR) is a rare yet devastating complication during endovascular treatment (EVT) of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. This study aimed to systematically assess the predictors, procedural risk factors, and clinical outcomes of IPR through meta-analytic synthesis. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted through May 2025. Eleven retrospective studies, including 11,081 unruptured aneurysms, were analyzed. Risk factors, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes were evaluated, and pooled proportions and odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models. The crude estimated incidence of IPR among unruptured aneurysms across all studies was approximately 6.4%. Advanced age (≥ 60 years; 99.8%), female sex (63.3%), and hypertension (44.1%) were prevalent among IPR cases. Irregular aneurysm morphology (82.9%) and anterior communicating artery (ACom) location (22.3%) emerged as significant anatomical predictors. The simple coiling technique was associated with higher IPR rates (23.4% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.001), whereas no IPR events were reported with flow diverters. Only 22.3% of patients had favorable long-term outcomes. IPR in EVT of unruptured aneurysms is rare but severe, primarily affecting elderly hypertensive females with irregular ACom aneurysms. Simple coiling techniques heighten risk, while flow diverters show promise as safer alternatives. Targeted strategies are needed to prevent this critical complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40938416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.