Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938375›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2025

Predicting molecular subtypes of pediatric medulloblastoma using MRI-based artificial intelligence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jiaying Liu, Zhenzhuang Zou, Yunfei He, Zhenfeng Guo, Changwei Yi, Bo Huang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiaying LiuThe Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai, China. jiayingliu@zmu.edu.cn.
Zhenzhuang ZouThe Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai, China.
Yunfei HeXishui County People's Hospital, Zunyi, China.
Zhenfeng GuoThe Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai, China.
Changwei YiThe Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai, China.
Bo HuangThe Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai, China. bohuang@zmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting molecular subtypes of pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) in children.

methodsA thorough review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to locate pertinent studies released prior to October 2024. Selected studies focused on the diagnostic performance of AI based on MRI in detecting molecular subtypes of pediatric MB. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Study heterogeneity was assessed using I

resultsAmong the 540 studies determined, eight studies (involving 1195 patients) were included. For the wingless (WNT), the combined sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on MRI were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.61-0.83, I

conclusionsMRI-based artificial intelligence shows high diagnostic performance in detecting molecular subtypes of pediatric MB. However, all included studies employed retrospective designs, which may introduce potential biases. More researches using external validation datasets are needed to confirm the results and assess their clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCerebellar NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedulloblastomaChildHumansSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceMagnetic resonance imagingMedulloblastomaMeta-analysisRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.