Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938366›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Gastrojejunostomy revision combined with biliopancreatic limb lengthening provides superior weight loss and metabolic outcomes compared to gastrojejunostomy revision alone in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients with weight recurrence.

Leo I Amodu, Lauren Johnson, Kallie E Wynens, Omkar S Pawar, Nicholas Catanzaro, Sakib Adnan, Leena Khaitan, Mujjahid Abbas

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leo I AmoduDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. amodleo@gmail.com.
Lauren JohnsonDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Kallie E WynensDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Omkar S PawarDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Nicholas CatanzaroDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Sakib AdnanDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Leena KhaitanDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Mujjahid AbbasDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RNYGB) is an effective bariatric surgical procedure for weight loss. Some patients experience weight recurrence or fail to lose weight after a RNYGB. No consensus exists on a recommended revisional procedure for RNYGB patients with weight recurrence.

methodsWe carried out a retrospective review of records from 2010 to 2024, examining patients who had a prior RNYGB, requiring revision for weight recurrence. We compared patients who had revision of the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis alone, to patients who had revision of the gastrojejunal anastomosis and lengthening of the biliopancreatic (BP) limb (GJ + BPLL). We compared demographics, weight outcomes, as well as postoperative complications.

resultsFifty-one RNYGB patients had a revision primarily for weight recurrence. Twenty-three patients had a GJ revision alone, while 28 patients had a GJ + BPLL. At 24 months post-revision, the GJ + BPLL group had a significantly lower median weight (lbs.) (GJ vs. GJ + BPLL; 288 vs. 186, p = 0.003), as well as BMI (GJ vs. GJ + BPLL; 45.1 vs. 31.91, p = 0.024). Post-revision HbA1c levels were also significantly lower in the GJ + BPLL group (GJ vs. GJ + BPLL; 5.4 vs. 5, p = 0.035). The GJ + BPLL group had a higher rate of multiple vitamin deficiencies. There was no difference between the groups beyond 36 months.

conclusionIn patients with weight recidivism after a primary RNYGB, GJ + BPLL can achieve greater reduction in weight and BMI with comparable complication rates compared to GJ revision alone, with a clear advantage in HbA1c reduction. While the weight loss outcomes appear to equalize between groups after 36 months, no patients with GJ + BPLL returned to their pre-revision weight. Larger studies are needed to evaluate differences in durability of GJ + BPLL, as well as other long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidReoperationWeight LossAdultBiliopancreatic DiversionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiliopancreaticBypassRecidivismRecurrenceRevisionRoux

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.