Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938290›Full record

ArticleBioethics2026

Thoughtful Accompaniment in Life's Final Stages: Philosophical Practice as a Complement to Ethics Consultation.

Patrick Schuchter, Sandra Radinger, Stefanie Veronika Rieger, Klaus Wegleitner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick SchuchterCenter for Interdisciplinary Research on Aging and Care (CIRAC), University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-9251
Sandra RadingerInstitut für Pastoraltheologie und Pastoralpsychologie, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7566-4424
Stefanie Veronika RiegerCenter for Interdisciplinary Research on Aging and Care (CIRAC), University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Klaus WegleitnerCenter for Interdisciplinary Research on Aging and Care (CIRAC), University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) 10.55776/P35627.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper argues that philosophical practice can complement existing medical ethics structures by offering a publicly accessible space for discourse and negotiation of basic concepts that are relevant to ethical decision making. The potential of collaboration becomes particularly evident by the example of assisted dying: it raises a wide range of philosophical questions which, however, tend to remain unarticulated where there is urgency for action and focus on ethical dilemma. In this paper, we first provide an analysis of the neglect of profound questions in ethics consultation and why these need to be considered and negotiated within a broader socio-philosophical framework and place. These reflections are grounded in conceptual approaches informed by Immanuel Kant, Charles Taylor, and the tradition of Hellenistic philosophy as interpreted by Pierre Hadot. These frameworks are not presented as final answers, but as productive starting points and historically significant philosophical thought figures for engaging with the complex philosophical dimensions of assisted suicide. Then, we draw upon insights from an ongoing research project on philosophical practice in palliative care and hospice work. Interim results indicate that people experience a need for a kind of dialogue that gives such philosophical considerations a space and a person who is capable of facilitating it. Synthesizing theoretical-philosophical and empirical insights, the paper provides an outlook for fruitful collaboration amongst medical ethics structures and philosophical practice.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEthics ConsultationPalliative CarePhilosophySuicide, AssistedTerminal CareHumansassisted dyingethics consultationhealth sociologymedical ethicsphilosophical consultationphilosophical practice

Identifiers

PMID40938290
PMCPMC12918499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.