Trial reportSuicide & life-threatening behavior2025
Comparing the Impacts of Crisis Response Plan and Self-Administered Safety Plan Use in Real Life on Key Clinical Outcomes.
Trial report in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the Impacts of Crisis Response Plan and Self-Administered Safety Plan Use in Real Life on Key Clinical Outcomes.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2025Trial
- Suicide safety plan engagement: Temporal dynamics and momentary predictors.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuicidal crises can occur when a clinician is not available to intervene. Safety planning-type interventions, such as the Crisis Response Plan (CRP) and the self-guided Safety Plan (SP), were developed to provide patients with skills to manage their suicide risk in daily life. These plans are similar in makeup, but differ in terms of how they are created. This study examined whether plan type moderated associations between frequency of plan use and suicide ideation and affect.
methodParticipants were 115 military personnel in a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of CRP versus a self-guided SP who completed an ecological momentary assessment battery. Generalized linear mixed-effects models examined whether plan type moderated the association between daily plan use frequency and clinical outcomes.
resultsTreatment group moderated the relationship between plan use frequency and the odds of suicidal ideation. When participants used plans more frequently than their average, they reported lower suicidal ideation and higher positive affect for CRP versus self-guided SP.
conclusionsMore frequent CRP use was linked with lower risk of suicidal ideation and greater positive affect. This may reflect better plan use due to clinician guidance. Results have critical implications for the implementation of safety planning-type interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.