Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938239›Full record

ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2025

Diagnostic Performance of the New Free Light Chain Ratio in Systemic Amyloidosis.

Paolo Milani, Giuseppe Damiano Sanna, Claudia Bellofiore, Mario Nuvolone, Marco Basset, Roberta Mussinelli, Giulia Mazzini, Martina Nanci, Martina Ciardo, Serena Caminito and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Paolo MilaniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Giuseppe Damiano SannaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, Sassari University Hospital, Sassari, Italy.
Claudia BellofioreDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Mario NuvoloneDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Marco BassetDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Roberta MussinelliAmyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Giulia MazziniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Martina NanciDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Martina CiardoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Serena CaminitoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Matin Ghazi EsfahaniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Mohammadjavad SadrzadehDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Alessandro FoglianiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Francesca BenignaClinical Chemistry Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Gianluigi GuidaUniversitary Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Francesco SalinaroAmyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Tiziana BosoniClinical Chemistry Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Alessandra BarassiDepartment of Health Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea FoliAmyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Riccardo AlbertiniClinical Chemistry Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Stefano PerliniAmyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Giampaolo MerliniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni PalladiniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy. Electronic address: giovanni.palladini@unipv.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of monoclonal components (MCs) using serum and urine immunofixation (IFE) and free light chain measurement is a critical early step in diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis. Patients with MCs are referred for biopsy-based diagnostic work-up. New reference ranges for the free light chain ratio (FLCR), adjusted for age and estimated glomerular filtration rate, have been proposed.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the new vs the conventional FLCR in patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis and wild-type transthyretin (ATTRwt) amyloidosis.

methodsThe analysis included 1,705 patients with AL amyloidosis and 675 with ATTRwt amyloidosis.

resultsIn the AL cohort, 44 patients (3%) had negative results on serum and urine IFE at diagnosis. Among these, 13 patients had normal conventional FLCRs and 15 had normal new FLCRs, with no significant difference in diagnostic sensitivity (70.4% [95% CI: 55.8%-82.5%] vs 65.9% [95% CI: 50.0%-79.5%]; P = 0.82). Overall diagnostic sensitivity for MC detection was similar between the new and conventional FLCRs (99.2% vs 99.1%). Among patients with ATTRwt amyloidosis and negative serum and urine IFE results, 156 (26.5%) had abnormal FLCRs using the conventional cutoff, compared with only 12 (2%) using the new FLCR. At hematologic response assessment in AL amyloidosis, concordance in the definition of complete response between the 2 FLCR methods was 94.9% (95% CI: 93.4%-95.9%).

conclusionsThe new FLCR demonstrates equivalent diagnostic sensitivity in AL amyloidosis and can be integrated into complete response criteria. In patients with suspected ATTRwt amyloidosis, it significantly reduces the proportion of FLCR-only abnormalities, thereby limiting the need for biopsy confirmation.

Indexed as

AL amyloidosisATTRwt amyloidosisbiomarkersdiagnosisendomyocardial biopsymonoclonal proteinserum free-light chainsFLC

Identifiers

PMID40938239
PMCPMC12790041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.