ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2025
Movement of bacteria in the soil and the rhizosphere.
Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Should I stay or should I go? DNA damage thresholds drive stay-or-go decisions inJournal of bacteriology · 2026Review
- Characterization of chemotaxis in soybean symbiontApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Study of wrap mode impact on Pseudomonas aeruginosa motion in the chemotactic field of fungi.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Bacterial motility in rhizosphere colonization: mechanisms, constraints, and implications for microbial inoculants.The ISME journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The soil and the rhizosphere are physicochemically heterogeneous environments that host diverse macro- and micro-organisms that together influence soil productivity. The ability of organisms to disperse in these environments allows them to exploit resources and to occupy niches that support growth and protect them from predation and stressful conditions. The dispersal of soil macroorganisms has been much better characterized than that of bacteria because of the complexity and physicochemical heterogeneity of the soil and the rhizosphere, and challenges in quantifying the dispersion of bacteria in these environments. However, even limited bacterial dispersal in soils and the rhizosphere could have the potential to alter the local microbiome composition and its function. Active bacterial movement includes swimming and swarming using flagella, twitching motility using pili, as well as emerging forms of motility that result from microbe-microbe interactions. Passive transport of bacteria throughout the soil may be mediated by passive physical factors such as rainfalls, as well as through transport mediated by protists, nematodes, or hitchhiking using other microbes' appendages. This minireview focuses on the modes of bacterial movement in the soil and the rhizosphere that do not depend on passive physical factors (e.g., rainfalls) and identifies areas of future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.