ArticleJournal of vision2025
Advancing vision standards in aviation: Embracing evidence-based approaches.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and pilot performance in simulated flight scenarios, including poor weather conditions, attempting to determine minimum visual requirements for safe flight. Twenty-six participants with normal or corrected-to-normal vision and varying flight experience (0-400 flight hours) completed simulated flight circuits under different weather conditions (e.g., rain, wind) using either Cambridge Simulation Glasses or defocusing lenses to degrade vision. Flight performance was assessed subjectively by an instructor using standardized criteria and objectively via simulator data. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured at each level of visual degradation. Mixed model analysis of variance revealed significant differences in the variability of vertical speed, pitch, roll, and the slope of altitude descent as a function of vision degradation level and weather conditions. There was also a significant main effect of vision degradation type (scatter or defocus) on the slope of altitude descent. Post hoc analyses indicated flight performance was first affected at 1.0 and 1.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution degradation with scattering and defocusing lenses, respectively. These results suggest that current vision standards should potentially be reevaluated for them to be more based on evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.