Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938071›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Selective Impairment of Rod-Driven Vision in Vitamin A Deficiency: Insights From Examining the Effect of Desensitizing Backgrounds.

Megan Margetts, Remi Rufus-Toye, Xiaofan Jiang, Shaun M Leo, Isabelle Chow, Mathura Indusegaran, Pirro G Hysi, Andrew R Webster, Christopher J Hammond, Omar A Mahroo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Megan MargettsPhysiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Remi Rufus-ToyePhysiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Xiaofan JiangInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shaun M LeoInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Isabelle ChowSection of Ophthalmology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Mathura IndusegaranSection of Ophthalmology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Pirro G HysiSection of Ophthalmology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew R WebsterInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher J HammondSection of Ophthalmology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Omar A MahrooPhysiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore whether nyctalopia in vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is attributable to simple reduction in quantal catch or to an "equivalent background" phenomenon. Methods: Five individuals were recruited for experimental electroretinograms (ERGs), including three healthy participants (aged 21 to 47 years), one patient with VAD (aged 70 years), and one patient with GNAT2-associated achromatopsia (aged 43 years). Recordings used conductive fiber electrodes and followed dark adaptation and mydriasis. Dim flashes of varying strengths were delivered in the dark to mimic reduction in quantal catch; flashes of fixed strength (0.03 scotopic cd·s/m2) were delivered on dim blue backgrounds. Results: International standard recordings in the patient with VAD showed selective attenuation of dark-adapted responses in severe deficiency, which normalized following treatment. Light-adapted responses did not change. In experimental recordings, both reducing flash strength and applying dim backgrounds reduced ERG amplitude. Reducing flash strength also increased latency of the response, whose rising phase and peak became progressively delayed. Dim backgrounds did not prolong latency. This was seen in all participants, including the patient with achromatopsia, indicating that this was a property of the rod system. In moderate VAD, the dim-flash response was reduced, but not delayed, resembling the response seen in the presence of a dim background. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that rod system desensitization in VAD likely arises from an "equivalent background" effect, probably arising from activation of phototransduction by free opsin. Activation to a similar degree is known not to occur in cones, helping explain why VAD selectively affects night vision.

Indexed as

Night BlindnessRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsVitamin A DeficiencyAdultAgedColor Vision DefectsDark AdaptationElectroretinographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNight VisionPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40938071
PMCPMC12439512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.