Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938068›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

Advancing Question-Answering in Ophthalmology With Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Benchmarking Open-Source and Proprietary Large Language Models.

Quang Nguyen, Duy-Anh Nguyen, Khang Dang, Siyin Liu, Sophia Y Wang, William A Woof, Peter B M Thomas, Praveen J Patel, Konstantinos Balaskas, Johan H Thygesen and 2 more

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Quang NguyenUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Duy-Anh NguyenCT MedTech Ltd, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Khang DangDepartment of Informatics, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
Siyin LiuUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Sophia Y WangStanford Byers Eye Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
William A WoofUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Peter B M ThomasMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Praveen J PatelUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Konstantinos BalaskasUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Johan H ThygesenUCL Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK.
Honghan WuSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, , Glasgow, UK.
Nikolas PontikosUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application of combining information retrieval with text generation using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to benchmark the performance of open-source and proprietary generative large language models (LLMs) in question-answering in ophthalmology. Methods: Our dataset comprised 260 multiple-choice questions sourced from two question-answer banks designed to assess ophthalmic knowledge: the American Academy of Ophthalmology's (AAO) Basic and Clinical Science Course (BCSC) Self-Assessment program and OphthoQuestions. Our RAG pipeline retrieves documents in the BCSC companion textbook using ChromaDB, followed by reranking with Cohere to refine the context provided to the LLMs. Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT)-4-turbo and 3 open-source models (Llama-3-70B, Gemma-2-27B, and Mixtral-8 × 7B) are benchmarked using zero-shot, zero-shot with Chain-of-Thought (zero-shot-CoT), and RAG. Model performance is evaluated using accuracy on the two datasets. Quantization is applied to improve the efficiency of the open-source models. Effects of quantization level are also measured. Results: Using RAG, GPT-4-turbo's accuracy increased by 11.54% on BCSC and by 10.96% on OphthoQuestions. Importantly, the RAG pipeline greatly enhances overall performance of Llama-3 by 23.85%, Gemma-2 by 17.11%, and Mixtral-8 × 7B by 22.11%. Zero-shot-CoT had overall no significant improvement on the models' performance. Quantization using 4 bit was shown to be as effective as using 8 bits while requiring half the resources. Conclusions: Our work demonstrates that integrating RAG significantly enhances LLM accuracy especially for smaller LLMs. Translation Relevance: Using our RAG, smaller privacy-preserving open-source LLMs can be run in sensitive and resource-constrained environments, such as within hospitals, offering a viable alternative to cloud-based LLMs like GPT-4-turbo.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingInformation Storage and RetrievalOphthalmologyHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID40938068
PMCPMC12439504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.