ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multimodal Fusion-Driven Pesticide Residue Detection: Principles, Applications, and Emerging Trends.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluorescence/surface-enhanced Raman scattering dual-mode sensor based on Ag/CQDs/ZIF-8 for human carboxylesterase 1 detection.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Circular Strategies for Plastic Recycling and Upcycling.Polymers · 2026Review
- Machine learning-assisted SERS detection of pyrethroid pesticides in edible fungi using a magnetic nanosensor.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology and Agricultural Sustainability: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nanomaterial-Enabled Spectroscopic Sensing: Building a New Paradigm for Precision Detection of Pesticide Residues.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticides are essential for modern agriculture but leave harmful residues that threaten human health and ecosystems. This paper reviews key pesticide detection technologies, including chromatography and mass spectrometry, spectroscopic methods, biosensing (aptamer/enzyme sensors), and emerging technologies (nanomaterials, AI). Chromatography-mass spectrometry remains the gold standard for lab-based precision, while spectroscopic techniques enable non-destructive, multi-component analysis. Biosensors offer portable, real-time field detection with high specificity. Emerging innovations, such as nano-enhanced sensors and AI-driven data analysis, are improving sensitivity and efficiency. Despite progress, challenges persist in sensitivity, cost, and operational complexity. Future research should focus on biomimetic materials for specificity, femtogram-level nano-enhanced detection, microfluidic "sample-to-result" systems, and cost-effective smart manufacturing. Addressing these gaps will strengthen food safety from farm to table while protecting ecological balance. This overview aids researchers in method selection, supports regulatory optimization, and evaluates sustainable pest control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.