SynthesisActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025
Epidural Analgesia Versus Systemic Opioids for Postoperative Pain Management After VATS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on postoperative pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic partial lung resection: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Trial
- Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Major Cancer Surgery: An Update.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Effect of ERAS-based refined nursing on postoperative pain management in lung cancer surgery patients.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Dynamic prediction model for early postoperative pain based on generalized estimating equations: a multi-timepoint longitudinal study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFirm consensus on the best perioperative pain management after Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) is lacking. Recommendations often assess different loco-regional techniques as part of a multimodal approach, but few discuss omitting regional analgesia altogether, eliminating any risk of procedural complications. A reasonable prerequisite for this approach would be that the alternative provides comparable pain relief. To compare the efficacy of systemic opioids and epidural analgesia for postoperative pain management, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of current studies.
methodsWe did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on VATS with the primary objective of examining postoperative pain at rest and during activity at POD1, POD2, and POD3. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments, examining the need for postoperative "rescue" opioid, the hospital length of stay, and side effects. We did literature searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 07 April 2025. Additionally, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We included adult patients undergoing VATS receiving either epidural analgesia or systemic opioids for postoperative pain management.
resultsWe included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four observational studies encompassing 946 patients. The primary meta-analysis of the RCTs found that epidural analgesia reduced pain compared with systemic opioids by a pooled mean difference of 0.8 NRS/VAS points (95% CI 0.2-1.3) at rest and 1.1 points (0.7-1.5) during activity over POD 1 to 3. Heterogeneity was substantial (I
conclusionEpidural analgesia offers a small but possibly subclinical reduction in acute postoperative pain after VATS compared with systemic opioids, particularly when combined with baseline multimodal analgesia. High heterogeneity and moderate certainty underscore the need for adequately powered trials. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42024598757.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.