Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937889›Full record

ReviewConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

Evolution of research on global amphibian declines.

Jordann Crawford-Ash, Maldwyn John Evans, Tamilie Carvalho, Jodi J L Rowley, Trenton W J Garner, Erin Muths, Ben C Scheele

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolution of research on global amphibian declines.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jordann Crawford-AshFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8073-2946
Maldwyn John EvansFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7025-2287
Tamilie CarvalhoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7300-2777
Jodi J L RowleyCentre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Trenton W J GarnerInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.
Erin MuthsFort Collins Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Ben C ScheeleFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-629X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the late 1980s, the scientific community became aware of severe, enigmatic amphibian population declines. These declines triggered a wave of research focused on quantifying their extent and identifying key drivers. We used text-analysis techniques, including topic modeling and geoparsing, to examine the evolution of research focused on amphibian declines. We sought to provide an example of scientific inquiry in action, from the initial recognition and quantification of the phenomenon to identifying drivers and understanding mechanisms of amphibian decline. We delineated research topics, tracked spatiotemporal trends from 1985 to 2024, and extracted the number of publications per topic. Early research focused on evaluating the veracity of declines and was followed by investigations of potential drivers (in particular, UVB radiation, pollution, and habitat fragmentation and loss). After the amphibian chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) was identified in the late 1990s, research emphasis shifted toward disease. Subsequently, disease-focused research became increasingly specialized, the primary topics of which were susceptibility, resistance and tolerance, and mitigation. Most recently, extinction risk and climate change became increasingly prominent topics, reflecting emerging threats to amphibians. Regions with high amphibian biodiversity and observed declines (e.g., Central and South America) were underrepresented in the literature, and research was strongly biased toward North America, Australia, and Europe. We uncovered a clear disconnect between the amphibian decline literature and the development of effective management and conservation actions. To address this gap, we suggest an increased emphasis on the application of existing knowledge to drive meaningful conservation outcomes and prioritization of new research on ongoing and emerging threats.

Indexed as

AmphibiansConservation of Natural ResourcesResearchAnimalsBiodiversityClimate ChangeExtinction, BiologicalPopulation Dynamicsacción de conservaciónamphibian declineconservation actiondeclinación de anfibiosgeographic biasmodelado de temasresearch trendssesgo geográficotendencias en la investigació ntopic modeling两栖动物数量下降, 研究趋势, 主题建模, 保护行动, 地理偏差

Identifiers

PMID40937889
PMCPMC12856797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.