Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937885›Full record

ArticleJournal of microscopy2026

Crossing scales and eras: Correlative multimodal microscopy heritage studies.

Charles Wood, George Deakin, Atousa Moayedi, Jovana Radulovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charles WoodCoMic Research Group, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
George DeakinCoMic Research Group, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3737-3473
Atousa MoayediCoMic Research Group, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Jovana RadulovicSchool of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comprehensive characterisation of complex, irreplaceable cultural heritage artefacts presents significant challenges for traditional analytical methods, which can fall short in providing multi-scale, non-invasive analysis. Correlative Multimodal Microscopy (CoMic), an approach that integrates data from multiple techniques, offers a powerful solution by bridging structural, chemical, and topographical information across different length scales. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the evolution, current applications, and future trajectory of CoMic within the field of heritage science. We present a historical overview of microscopy in heritage studies and detail the principles and advances of key techniques, such as electron, X-ray, optical, and probe microscopies. This review presents practical applications through case studies on materials that include wood, pigments, ceramics, metals, and textiles. To aid CoMic uptake, we also provide user-centric guides for researchers with diverse expertise. This review also examines the challenges that currently limit the widespread adoption of CoMic, challenges that include sample preparation, data correlation accuracy, high instrumental and resource costs, and the need for specialised interdisciplinary expertise. Although CoMic is a transformative methodology for artefact analysis and conservation, its full potential will be realised through future developments in accessible instrumentation, standardised protocols, and the integration of AI-driven data analysis. This review serves as a critical resource and roadmap for researchers, conservators, and institutions looking to harness the power of correlative microscopy to preserve our shared cultural legacy.

Indexed as

artefact analysisconservation sciencecorrelative multimodal microscopy (CoMic)cultural heritageelectron microscopynon‐destructive analysisX‐ray microscopy

Identifiers

PMID40937885
PMCPMC12746372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.