ArticleJournal of microscopy2026
Crossing scales and eras: Correlative multimodal microscopy heritage studies.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Crossing scales and eras: Correlative multimodal microscopy heritage studies.Journal of microscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The comprehensive characterisation of complex, irreplaceable cultural heritage artefacts presents significant challenges for traditional analytical methods, which can fall short in providing multi-scale, non-invasive analysis. Correlative Multimodal Microscopy (CoMic), an approach that integrates data from multiple techniques, offers a powerful solution by bridging structural, chemical, and topographical information across different length scales. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the evolution, current applications, and future trajectory of CoMic within the field of heritage science. We present a historical overview of microscopy in heritage studies and detail the principles and advances of key techniques, such as electron, X-ray, optical, and probe microscopies. This review presents practical applications through case studies on materials that include wood, pigments, ceramics, metals, and textiles. To aid CoMic uptake, we also provide user-centric guides for researchers with diverse expertise. This review also examines the challenges that currently limit the widespread adoption of CoMic, challenges that include sample preparation, data correlation accuracy, high instrumental and resource costs, and the need for specialised interdisciplinary expertise. Although CoMic is a transformative methodology for artefact analysis and conservation, its full potential will be realised through future developments in accessible instrumentation, standardised protocols, and the integration of AI-driven data analysis. This review serves as a critical resource and roadmap for researchers, conservators, and institutions looking to harness the power of correlative microscopy to preserve our shared cultural legacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.