ArticleInternational endodontic journal2026
Enhancing the Quality of Single Cone Obturation Using Hydroxyapatite Precursor Grafted Nanocomplex for Dentine Conditioning: An In Vitro Study.
Article in International endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Single-Cone vs. Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturation with a Calcium-Silicate-Based Sealer: An In Vitro µ-CT Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to quantify the effect of chitosan-hydroxyapatite precursor nanocomplexes (C-HA) on void reduction in the root canal system and isthmus regions, characterise void distribution patterns and assess sealer-dentin interface adaptation post-conditioning. METHODOLOGY: Vertucci type II and Yin type IV mesial root canals from 24 extracted mandibular first molars were randomly divided into two groups (n = 12): (1) C-HA conditioned and (2) control (deionised water). All canals underwent standardised preparation using ProTaper Next files with 3% NaOCl irrigation (2 mL per file change) and final irrigation with 17% EDTA (5 mL, sonic activation) followed by 3% NaOCl (5 mL) and a final deionised water rinse (5 mL). Before obturation, the C-HA group received 5 min of C-HA solution (2 mg/mL) treatment with active agitation by ProTaper Next X2 gutta-percha cone, while the control group received equivalent water treatment. Canals were obturated using the single-cone technique with Ceraseal. High-resolution Micro-CT (8.6 μm voxel size) quantified void percentages in the entire canal system and isthmus regions, with analysis stratified by coronal, middle and apical thirds. Selected specimens underwent SEM evaluation of interfacial adaptation. Statistical analysis used the independent samples t-test, two-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc tests (α = 0.05), and Fisher's exact test.
resultsNo significant differences related to the canal/isthmus pre-treatment volumes and isthmus characteristics were noted between the two groups. Micro-CT analysis revealed significantly lower void percentages in C-HA-treated canals compared to controls (9.21% vs. 19.01% in the entire canal system and 19.07% vs. 55.65% in the isthmus regions, p < 0.001). Analysis of the void distribution patterns further demonstrated statistically significant differences between the groups in the cervical and middle root thirds (p < 0.05). SEM evaluation showed continuous, gap-free interfaces with bioactive mineralization in C-HA-treated canals, contrasting with discontinuous adaptation and sparse precipitates in controls.
conclusionC-HA dentine conditioning significantly improved obturation quality with Ceraseal bioceramic sealer by reducing voids in isthmus regions and enhancing sealer-dentin interfacial adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.