Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937861›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

The general version of Hamilton's rule.

Matthijs van Veelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthijs van VeelenDepartment of Economics, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8290-9212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generality of Hamilton's rule is much debated. In this paper, I show that this debate can be resolved by constructing a general version of Hamilton's rule, which allows for a large variety of ways in which the fitness of an individual can depend on the social behavior of oneself and of others. For this, I first derive the Generalized Price equation, which reconnects the Price equation with the statistics it borrows its terminology from. The Generalized Price equation, moreover, shows that there is not just one Price equation, but there is a Price-like equation for every possible true model. This implies that there are also multiple, nested rules to describe selection. The simplest rule is the rule for selection of non-social traits with linear fitness effects. This rule is nested in the classical version of Hamilton's rule, for which there is consensus that it works for social traits with linear, independent fitness effects. The classical version of Hamilton's rule, in turn, is nested in more general rules that, for instance, allow for nonlinear and/or interdependent fitness effects, like Queller's rule. The general version of Hamilton's rule, therefore, is a constructive solution that allows us to accurately describe when costly cooperation evolves in a wide variety of circumstances. As a byproduct, we also find a hierarchy of nested rules for selection of non-social traits.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessSelection, GeneticSocial BehaviorHumansevolutionary biologyHamilton's rulekin selectionnonepopulation geneticsPrice equationQueller's rulerelatedness

Identifiers

PMID40937861
PMCPMC12431776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.