ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2025
Uncovering the photoexcited dynamics in bis(acyl)phosphine oxide photoinitiators.
Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating DFT-assisted optimization into HPLC-DAD method development: simultaneous determination of four acylphosphine oxide compounds in nail gel polish.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026Article
- Digital light processing bioprinting: bioink innovations and applications in tissue and organ regeneration.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Donor-acceptor complexes between photoinitiators and hybrid organic-inorganic SZ2080™ photoresist.Materials advances · 2026Article
- Tuning Ag/Co Metal Ion Composition to Control In Situ Nanoparticle Formation, Photochemical Behavior, and Magnetic-Dielectric Properties of UV-Cured Epoxy Diacrylate Nanocomposites.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acylphosphine oxide photoinitiators, such as phenylbis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide (BAPO) and diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide (TPO), are widely used as sensitisers in UV polymerisation applications due to their favourable properties for UV lithography. However, the underlying photophysical and photochemical mechanisms that govern their performance remain poorly understood. In this study, we systematically investigate these compounds using steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence, as well as electronic and infrared transient absorption spectroscopic techniques. The results show that the lowest electronic excitation of both BAPO and TPO leads to a rapid intersystem crossing (ISC) into the hot triplet manifold-which rapidly generates radicals, further undergoing relaxation and leading to a slower rate of radical formation from the cold triplet manifold. ISC is faster in TPO compared to BAPO, which exhibits more complex dynamics. In addition, time-resolved infrared data reveal that both sensitisers generate radicals (by α-cleavage) on a time scale similar to that of ISC, suggesting that the hot triplet state is very short-lived. Finally, nanosecond-to-microsecond electronic TA spectroscopy revealed multi-stage relaxation of the radicals with the formation of TPO photoproducts remaining detectable on microsecond time scales.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.