Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937630›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2025

Evaluation of health-related quality of life in cats with chronic kidney disease.

Sarah K Lorbach, Jessica M Quimby, Eline Nijveldt, Rene E Paschall, E Marian Scott, Jacqueline Reid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah K LorbachDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jessica M QuimbyDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1388-0452
Eline NijveldtDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rene E PaschallDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
E Marian ScottUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Jacqueline ReidUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1673-9083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cats with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and integrate these results with clinical data to identify factors associated with decreased HRQoL.MethodsCaregivers completed a validated HRQoL tool (VetMetrica) and clinical data (history, laboratory work, physical examination findings, etc) were collected. Vitality, comfort and emotional wellbeing (EWB) scores were compared between groups using non-parametric analyses as appropriate.ResultsData from 24 healthy cats and 68 cats with CKD were collected. Cats with CKD had significantly lower median vitality, comfort and EWB scores (vitality: 41.7, range 4.3-64; comfort: 36.1, range 21.2-59.6; EWB: 44.6, range 1.6-58.8) than healthy cats (vitality: 56.5, range 40.7-64; comfort: 59.6, range 34.2-59.6; EWB: 58.7, range 45.1-58.8) (

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesQuality of LifeRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAnimalsCase-Control StudiesCatsFemaleMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesanaemiaappetiteCaregiver burdenconstipationpolypharmacywellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40937630
PMCPMC12432299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.