Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937535›Full record

SynthesisJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025

Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Diseases Using C5-OH as a Marker: Systematic Review of the Literature and Evaluation of 17 Years of C5-OH Screening in the Netherlands.

Ryan Aukes, Monique Albersen, Anita Boelen, Leo A J Kluijtmans, Wouter F Visser, Maaike C de Vries, Annet M Bosch, C5‐OH NBS Working Group

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryan AukesDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Metabolic Disorders, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6417-5208
Monique AlbersenEndocrine Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anita BoelenEndocrine Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Leo A J KluijtmansLaboratory of Genome Diagnostics, Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Wouter F VisserCenter for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Maaike C de VriesDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Metabolic Disorders, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Annet M BoschDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Metabolic Disorders, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-5916
C5‐OH NBS Working Group

Funding

Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2007, the Dutch newborn screening (NBS) program was expanded to include C5-OH as a marker to screen for three inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs): 3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase deficiency (3-MCCD), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA lyase deficiency (HMGCLD) and holocarboxylase synthetase deficiency (HLCSD). This study evaluates the effectiveness of C5-OH as an NBS marker by analyzing data from neonates screened in the Dutch NBS program from 2007 to 2023 and by reviewing the literature on various IEMs detected by an elevated NBS C5-OH concentration worldwide. Of the 126 neonates referred on the basis of elevated C5-OH concentrations in the Netherlands, 46 were true positive cases. No missed cases in the Netherlands have been reported so far, resulting in a positive predictive value of 38.3% and a negative predictive value of 100%. Strikingly, there was notable overlap between C5-OH concentrations of true and false positive cases. The systematic review included 58 articles and showed that C5-OH concentrations of patients with different IEMs reported in the literature were insufficiently distinctive to differentiate between these diseases. While C5-OH can be used to detect patients with 3-MCCD, HCLSD, and HMGCLD, its value is limited by the overlap of C5-OH concentrations between affected and unaffected neonates and among patients with different diseases. This emphasizes the need for improvement of the screening strategy and potentially the use of additional markers to increase its specificity.

Indexed as

Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsNeonatal ScreeningBiomarkersCarbon-Carbon LigasesHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPredictive Value of TestsUrea Cycle Disorders, InbornBiomarkersCarbon-Carbon Ligases3‐methylcrotonyl‐CoA carboxylase deficiencyC5‐OHeffectivenessHMG‐CoA lyase deficiencyholocarboxylase synthetase deficiencynewborn screening

Identifiers

PMID40937535
PMCPMC12426815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.