ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Thermal noise lowers the accuracy of rotationally invariant harmonics of diffusion MRI data and their robustness to experimental variations.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Directions: Symmetry-Aware Rotation Sets for Triaxial Diffusion Encoding by Geometric Filter Optimization.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Offline Reconstruction of Diffusion MRI Acquisitions for Comparison Between Complex PCA-Based and AI-Based Denoising.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Thermal noise lowers the accuracy of rotationally invariant harmonics of diffusion MRI data and their robustness to experimental variations.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Implicit neural representations for accurate estimation of the Standard Model of white matter.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Revisiting the interpretation of axon diameter mapping using higher-order signal representations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRotational invariants (RIs) are at the root of many dMRI applications. Among others, they are presented as a sensible way of reducing the dimensionality of biophysical models. While thermal noise impact on diffusion metrics has been well studied, little is known on its effect on spherical harmonics-based RI (RISH) features and derived markers. In this work, we evaluate the effect of noise on RISH features and downstream Standard Model Imaging (SMI) estimates. THEORY AND
methodsUsing simulated and test/retest multishell MRI data, we assess the accuracy and precision of RISH features and SMI parameters in the presence of thermal noise, as well as its robustness to variations in protocol design. We further propose and evaluate correction strategies that bypass the need of rotational invariant features as an intermediate step.
resultsBoth RISH features and SMI estimates are impacted by SNR-dependent Rician biases. However, higher-order RISH features are susceptible to a secondary noise-related source of bias, which not only depends on SNR, but also protocol and underlying microstructure. Rician bias-correcting techniques are insufficient to maximize the accuracy of RISH and SMI features, or to ensure consistency across protocols. SMI estimators that avoid RISH features by fitting the model to the directional diffusion MRI data outperform RISH-based approaches in accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility across acquisition protocols.
conclusionsRISH features are increasingly used in dMRI analysis, yet they are prone to various sources of noise that lower their accuracy and reproducibility. Understanding the impact of noise and mitigating such biases is critical to maximize the validity, repeatability, and reproducibility of dMRI studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.