Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937487›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Toward understanding apoplastic freezing under negative pressure.

Stephen Ingram, Alessandro Zanetti, Linnea Mustonen, Ana A Piedehierro, Ari Laaksonen, Anna Lintunen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen IngramInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki, 00560, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-0202
Alessandro ZanettiInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Forestry, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki, 00560, Finland.
Linnea MustonenFinnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palmenin aukio 1, Helsinki, 00560, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8210-178X
Ana A PiedehierroFinnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palmenin aukio 1, Helsinki, 00560, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1900-8139
Ari LaaksonenFinnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palmenin aukio 1, Helsinki, 00560, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1657-2383
Anna LintunenInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki, 00560, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-0784

Funding

Research Council of Finland 336557Research Council of Finland 342930Research Council of Finland 345125Research Council of Finland 353218Research Council of Finland 355142Research Council of Finland 357902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of negative liquid pressure on the freezing of xylem sap is a unique scientific problem. Equilibrium thermodynamics would suggest that, due to the density anomaly of ice, sap under tension should freeze at higher temperatures than under positive pressure. Yet, the opposite is observed in tree branches: freezing temperatures decrease as the pressure becomes more negative. Using a cold stage array, we measured the freezing points of sap samples extracted from Pinus sylvestris branches dehydrated to varying negative pressures and compared them with the freezing points of the sap-filled sample branches with similar negative pressures. We find that the freezing onset of extracted sap is c. 10 degrees lower than inside the branches, and uncorrelated with the water potential that was present before extraction. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that supercooling under tension is a purely physical phenomenon and that nucleation is initiated on the surface of the xylem tissue. By drawing an analogy with aerosol science, we propose that pores in the conduit walls may form either an ice embryo or a gas nanobubble, with the competition between the two determining the macroscopic freezing point. A phenomenological model based on the above mechanism reproduces the observed branch freezing onset temperatures within experimental uncertainty.

Indexed as

FreezingPinus sylvestrisPressureModels, BiologicalWaterXylemWaterapoplastic freezingfrost toleranceice nucleationnegative pressurexylem nanobubbles

Identifiers

PMID40937487
PMCPMC12489277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.