ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Imaging in perianal fistulising Crohn's disease: A practical guide for the gastroenterologist.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perianal Fistulae Medical Imaging Maps: A Pictorial Diagnostic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Imaging Evaluation and Staging of Crohn's Disease: When and Why to Use Intestinal Ultrasound, MRE, or CTE: Current Guidelines and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advanced Medical Therapies for Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical, Radiological, Surgical, and Composite Outcomes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Perianal Sonographic Approach to Fistula-in-Ano and Perianal Abscesses: A Pictorial Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Perianal Crohn's Disease in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Diagnosis, Assessment and Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Structured Versus Non-Structured Reporting of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Imaging: A Systematic Review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perianal fistulising Crohn's disease is a challenging complication that can affect up to 20% of patients with Crohn's disease and is associated with significant morbidity. Despite advances in medical therapies, particularly anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, the majority of patients still require surgical intervention. Accurate diagnosis and monitoring are essential to optimise outcomes and guide multidisciplinary management. Although clinical scoring systems such as the perianal disease activity index are widely used, their subjective application limits their reproducibility and reliability, underscoring the need for more objective methods of evaluating perianal fistulising Crohn's disease activity. Imaging has thus become central to the objective assessment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) recognised as the gold standard in view of its ability to provide clear, detailed images of the perianal region in a radiation-free manner. Guidelines also endorse the use of imaging modalities such as endoanal ultrasound and transperineal ultrasound as viable alternatives to MRI for the assessment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease in centres with appropriate expertise. This article aims to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of MRI, endoanal ultrasound, and transperineal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease, highlighting their respective strengths, limitations, and roles in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.