ArticleNational science review2025
Dual-loop upcycling of spent LiFePO
Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Electrothermal Shock for Synthesis and Reuse of Cathode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries.ChemSusChem · 2026Review
- Ion-Electron Coupling Strategy Induced by Interface Electric Field Enables High-Performance LiFePOAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Heating- and leaching-free separation of electrodes by liquid metals for regeneration of spent Li-ion batteries.National science review · 2026Article
- Leidenfrost-Assisted Synthesis of Indium-Substituted Mixed Phosphate Cathodes with Superior Cycling Stability and Enhanced Sodium Storage Kinetics.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Recycling Technologies for Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries: An Overview.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing accumulation of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) presents pressing environmental and societal challenges, highlighting the urgent need to reimagine them as sustainable energy resources. Traditionally, the formation of Fe vacancies ([Formula: see text]) in LiFePO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.