ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Human microbiota-associated animal models: a review.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric analysis of human microbiota-associated animal model (2005-2025).Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Humanizing Zophobas morio larvae microbiota for rapid screening of emerging decolonization strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Early-Life Antibiotic Cocktail Intervention Alters Cecal Microbiota Composition and Metabolic Profiles in Suckling Rats.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- An Update and Overview of the Ocular and Extraocular Microbiome and Its Impact on Ophthalmic Care.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Engineering human Gut-on-a-Chip culturomics for predictive pharmacomicrobiomics of first-pass metabolism.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- cGAS/STING Signaling in Ulcerative Colitis: Mechanism and Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation from Toddler Donors Ameliorated DSS-Induced Colitis in Mice by Reshaping Gut Microbiota.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Marine Polysaccharides Modulating the Gut Microbiota-Immune Axis in Digestive Tract Tumors: An Update.Marine drugs · 2026Review
- A Review of Gut Microbiota Dynamics: From Healthy Gestation to Gestational Diabetes in Human and Mouse Models.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential of tryptophan metabolism in gut-brain signaling transduction: a narrative review.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Diabetes Mellitus as an Integrated Microbiome, Immune, and Metabolic Disorder with Clinical Implications for Multisystem Complications and Public Health.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Human Microbiota-Associated Pig Models for Translational Microbiome Research: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Acupuncture modulates the microbiota-gut-brain axis to treat irritable bowel syndrome: a mechanistic exploration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Active Targeting Strategies for Improving the Bioavailability of Curcumin: A Systematic Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human microbiota-associated (HMA) animal models have become indispensable tools for investigating microbe-host interactions and disease pathogenesis. However, standardization challenges persist across different research groups when such models are used in fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) protocols. Establishing a successful HMA model involves multiple stages, including donor screening, fecal suspension preparation, recipient preparation, and FMT. The outcomes of these stages are influenced by donor characteristics, recipient type, microbial viability, and dietary factors. This review examined the critical components of HMA model production, including the inclusion and exclusion criteria for human donors, collection time and processing methodology for fecal samples, recipient animal preparation strategies, and FMT regimens with engraftment validation. The key findings revealed that short-term antibiotic, probiotic, or laxative use constitutes an essential donor exclusion criterion. The time and method of fecal collection should be standardized as much as possible. Fecal samples should be processed as soon as possible, in anaerobic environments, with the addition of suitable protectants if they must be preserved at low temperatures. Microbial community profiling via 16S rRNA gene sequencing represents the primary method for analyzing microbiome composition and verifying microbiota engraftment efficacy throughout FMT procedures. The most commonly used recipients for HMA modeling included germ-free and pseudo-germ-free animals generated through antibiotic-mediated microbiota depletion. Although FMT with a single gavage of fecal suspension proved sufficient for model establishment, multiple frequencies and longer FMT durations significantly improved the efficiency of donor microbiota colonization. Overall, these findings are expected to aid the establishment of a standardized and reproducible protocol for preparing HMA models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.