Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937436›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Human microbiota-associated animal models: a review.

Xiangning Huang, Yunfeng Yu, Na Tian, Jiawang Huang, Xiaoqin Zhang, Rong Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Humanizing Zophobas morio larvae microbiota for rapid screening of emerging decolonization strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiangning Huang *School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Yunfeng Yu *School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Na TianDepartment of Rehabilitation, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, China.
Jiawang HuangDepartment of Endocrine, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Xiaoqin ZhangDepartment of Endocrine, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Rong YuSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human microbiota-associated (HMA) animal models have become indispensable tools for investigating microbe-host interactions and disease pathogenesis. However, standardization challenges persist across different research groups when such models are used in fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) protocols. Establishing a successful HMA model involves multiple stages, including donor screening, fecal suspension preparation, recipient preparation, and FMT. The outcomes of these stages are influenced by donor characteristics, recipient type, microbial viability, and dietary factors. This review examined the critical components of HMA model production, including the inclusion and exclusion criteria for human donors, collection time and processing methodology for fecal samples, recipient animal preparation strategies, and FMT regimens with engraftment validation. The key findings revealed that short-term antibiotic, probiotic, or laxative use constitutes an essential donor exclusion criterion. The time and method of fecal collection should be standardized as much as possible. Fecal samples should be processed as soon as possible, in anaerobic environments, with the addition of suitable protectants if they must be preserved at low temperatures. Microbial community profiling via 16S rRNA gene sequencing represents the primary method for analyzing microbiome composition and verifying microbiota engraftment efficacy throughout FMT procedures. The most commonly used recipients for HMA modeling included germ-free and pseudo-germ-free animals generated through antibiotic-mediated microbiota depletion. Although FMT with a single gavage of fecal suspension proved sufficient for model establishment, multiple frequencies and longer FMT durations significantly improved the efficiency of donor microbiota colonization. Overall, these findings are expected to aid the establishment of a standardized and reproducible protocol for preparing HMA models.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaModels, AnimalAnimalsFecesHumansProbioticsengraftmentfecal microbiota transplantationgut microbe-host interactionshuman microbiota-associated animal modelsmicrobiomeprocedure

Identifiers

PMID40937436
PMCPMC12420304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.