ArticleJournal of biological methods2025
A customized large single-piece bifrontal implant for post-craniectomy defect reconstruction: A case study.
Article in Journal of biological methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reappraising the bifrontal decompressive craniectomy: A systematic literature review of indications, outcomes, and clinical applications.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Large bifrontal defects pose unique reconstruction challenges due to their complex curvature and mechanical requirements. This case demonstrated how computer-aided design/manufacturing (CAD/CAM) enabled precise single-piece polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) implant fabrication, thereby overcoming traditional limitations. Case presentation: A 25-year-old male who had undergone bifrontal decompressive craniectomy suffered a severe traumatic brain injury. The autologous bone flap had been temporarily stored in a subcutaneous fat area of the abdomen for 3 months to preserve its viability. A secondary cranioplasty was then performed using titanium miniplates and self-tapping screws for final fixation. After 2 years, the patient developed empyema and a brain abscess; the infected bone flap was removed. A skull computed tomography (CT) scan was conducted, and a prosthesis was created from PMMA by employing CAD. In the sagittal plane, the defect extended from the frontal bone and surpassed the coronal suture, while in the coronal plane, it reached the temporal region on both sides. The prosthesis was fabricated through rapid prototyping based on CT scan images. Surgery was performed using a patient-specific prosthesis that adequately covered the defect area. Facial aesthetics were restored, and no complications occurred. The patient was followed clinically and radiologically for 1 year, during which no postoperative complications or signs of implant-related issues were observed. Conclusion: This CAD/CAM single-piece PMMA implant successfully restored large bifrontal defects, suggesting that it may find broader applications in complex cranioplasties and could achieve improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.