ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2025
Integration of risk mitigation programmes in stunting prevention efforts for early childhood.
Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resilience through the integration of governance, lived experience, and knowledge.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stunting in early childhood remains a pressing public health issue in Gunungkidul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, which also faces frequent environmental challenges such as droughts. These challenges necessitate innovative approaches to ensure children's health and resilience. The purpose of this research is to examine the integration of mitigation programmes with efforts to combat stunting in early infancy, addressing the dual challenge of enhancing resilience while reducing stunting prevalence. This study employs a qualitative case study approach. Participants include key stakeholders such as health staff, government agencies, and parents of stunted children. The research findings reveal that integrating mitigation programmes can significantly enhance children's resilience to adverse conditions and prevent stunting by building community capacity, educating the public on preparedness and nutrition, and improving access to health services. The study identifies significant barriers, such as difficulties in sector coordination, low public awareness of the relationship between environmental risks and stunting, and limited resources. The findings have important policy and practical implications. Policymakers should prioritise cross-sector collaboration, allocate sufficient resources, and strengthen public awareness campaigns to ensure the effectiveness of integrated programmes. Practical interventions could include targeted training for healthcare providers and educators, community engagement in nutrition initiatives, and evidence-based decision-making to address these intertwined challenges comprehensively. Contribution: Exploration of the intersection between risk mitigation efforts and stunting prevention in early childhood provides valuable insights into how integrated programmes can enhance child resilience and prevent stunting in vulnerable communities. These findings offer actionable recommendations for improving policies and programme design in Indonesia while also serving as a reference for regions facing similar challenges globally, thereby contributing to broader discussions on public health and community resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.