Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937351›Full record

ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2025

Investigating disater risk management and climate change adaptation effectiveness in freetown, Sierra Leone.

Edwin Sam-Mbomah, Ksenia Chmutina, Alister Smith, Susie Goodall, Lee Bosher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edwin Sam-MbomahDepartment of Water Engineering Development Centre, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0593-9543
Ksenia ChmutinaDepartment of Water Engineering Development Centre, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5662-8954
Alister SmithDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3363-300X
Susie GoodallDepartment of Water Engineering Development Centre, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-8383
Lee BosherDepartment of Research Excellence, School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3888-0544

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freetown, Sierra Leone, faces increasing risks from hazards such as floods, landslides, mudslides, fires and coastal erosion, threats that are increasingly intensified by climate change. Although disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation (CCA) policies are in place, concerns persist regarding their effectiveness. This study investigates the extent to which these policies have transitioned from good intentions to effective interventions in Freetown. Employing a case study approach, the research critically examines the disaster context, reviews relevant policy frameworks and implementation processes, and identifies both enablers and barriers to effective policy execution across five informal settlements, Kroo Bay, Susans Bay, Kulvert, Kolleh Town and Dwarzack. The findings reveal systemic deficiencies in DRM and CCA, including weak legal and institutional structures, poor inter-agency coordination, inadequate enforcement, limited access to data, and ineffective risk communication. Further obstacles include insufficient community engagement, the absence of legal mechanisms for resolving DRM and CCA related disputes, corruption, political instability, underinvestment in research and technology, and inadequate urban planning. The study recommends strengthening policy and institutional frameworks, promoting integrated collaborative planning processes, and supporting community-led resilience initiatives. Key priorities include enhancing risk assessments, developing robust early warning systems (EWS), improving urban planning, and fostering innovation through research and technology. Contribution: The study identifies key measures for effective DRM and CCA in Freetown, including community inclusion, capacity building, financial mechanisms, data management, risk communication, and resilient infrastructure development, especially for "at-risk" communities.

Indexed as

climate change adaptationdisaster risk managementFreetownhazardSierra Leonevulnerability

Identifiers

PMID40937351
PMCPMC12421522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.