Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937283›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Insights into the mitochondrial DNA genetic diversity and affinities of village chickens from the Sulu Archipelago, Philippines.

Michael James B Herrera, Fairuz B Bangahan, Mark Laurence D Garcia, Michelle S Eusebio, John Meldwin D Cuales, Richard N Muallil, Altan I Ishmael, Raquel O Rubio, Rolly C Urriza, Jazelyn M Salvador and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michael James B HerreraSchool of Archaeology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6548-0816
Fairuz B BangahanSchool of Archaeology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Mark Laurence D GarciaSchool of Archaeology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Michelle S EusebioSchool of Archaeology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
John Meldwin D CualesDNA Analysis Laboratory, Natural Sciences Research Institute, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Richard N MuallilOffice of Continuing Education and Extension Services, Mindanao State University - Tawi-Tawi College of Technology and Oceanography, Bongao, Tawi-Tawi, BARMM, Philippines.
Altan I IshmaelSama Studies Center, Mindanao State University - Tawi-Tawi College of Technology and Oceanography, Bongao, Tawi-Tawi, BARMM, Philippines.
Raquel O RubioBiological Research and Services Laboratory, Natural Sciences Research Institute, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Rolly C UrrizaOrnithology Section, Zoology Division, National Museum of Natural History, National Museum of the Philippines, Manila, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Jazelyn M SalvadorDNA Analysis Laboratory, Natural Sciences Research Institute, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Jae Joseph Russell B RodriguezDNA Analysis Laboratory, Natural Sciences Research Institute, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Maria Corazon A De UngriaDNA Analysis Laboratory, Natural Sciences Research Institute, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sulu archipelago in the Philippines witnessed significant human migration from prehistoric to subrecent periods, resulting in a tapestry of cultures, languages, and genes. However, many details remain unclear. Archaeological evidence shows that human populations traversing within and between regions in Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) and the Pacific brought a variety of domestic animals, including dogs, pigs, chickens, and commensal Pacific rats. Recent insights into the ancient movements of these species suggest that they have different origins and arrival times. Here, we leveraged chickens as a tool to investigate human interactions in the Sulu archipelago. We sequenced a 764-base pair fragment of the mitochondrial DNA control region to examine the genetic diversity and structure of 254 village chickens from the Sulu archipelago. Combined with comparable datasets from other islands of ISEA and the Pacific, our data reveal a higher maternal genetic affinity of chickens from the Sulu Archipelago with those from adjacent Indonesian islands than with chickens from the rest of the Philippines. This observation points to long-standing regional interactions between the Sulu archipelago and Indonesia. Furthermore, core haplogroup D lineages, which characterise ancient Pacific chickens, are not found in the Sulu archipelago, but are present elsewhere in the Philippines.

Indexed as

chickenhuman migrationIsland Southeast Asiamitochondrial DNAPhilippinesSulu Archipelago

Identifiers

PMID40937283
PMCPMC12421329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.