ArticleAfrican journal of disability2025
Acceptability and perceived impact of a mental health and disability programme in Ghana.
Article in African journal of disability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ghana Somubi Dwumadie aimed to improve wellbeing of people with disabilities, including people with mental health conditions, through four pillars: strengthening policies and systems; scaling up integrated, accessible mental health services; reducing stigma and discrimination; and generating evidence to inform policy and practice. Despite these efforts, its implementation has not been comprehensively evaluated. Objectives: To assess the programme's acceptability and perceived impact from the perspective of key stakeholders, including government, civil society organisations, and grantees. Methods: A process evaluation, guided by the programme's Theory of Change, involved in-depth interviews with 32 stakeholders from programme partners, civil society and government. Document reviews supplemented data collection, and thematic analysis identified key insights. Results: Stakeholders highlighted the programme's technical assistance as crucial for strengthening advocacy and policy leadership in mental health. The integration of mental health services into primary care and the involvement of traditional leaders to reduce stigma were noted successes. Challenges included funding instability, gaps between advocacy and service delivery and limited control over implementing key policy reforms. Conclusion: Ghana Somubi Dwumadie made significant strides in disability inclusion and mental health care through its multi-sectoral, user-led approaches. Addressing challenges like sustainable funding and service delivery will be critical for ensuring lasting impact and scalability. Contribution: This study underscores the impact of user-led, multi-sectoral approaches in reducing stigma, scaling services, and empowering people with disabilities in resource-limited settings, while addressing challenges and strategies for disability-inclusive programming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.