Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937227›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Herpes Zoster Vaccine Uptake in Saudi Arabia: Factors Influencing Adults' Willingness to Receive the Vaccine.

Heba Dosh, Murouj Almaghrabi, Jehad Al Qurashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heba DoshGeneral Practice, Heraa General Hospital, Makkah, SAU.
Murouj AlmaghrabiPreventive Medicine, Makkah Health Cluster, Makkah, SAU.
Jehad Al QurashiPreventive Medicine, Ministry of Health Holdings, Makkah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate adults' willingness to receive the herpes zoster (HZ) vaccine in Saudi Arabia and identify key factors influencing their decisions.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among adults aged ≥18 years across five Saudi regions from August to September 2024. Data were collected using an Arabic electronic questionnaire covering vaccination prevalence, knowledge, willingness, barriers, and strategies to enhance HZ vaccine uptake.

resultsAmong 579 participants, only 14.3% of older adults aged 50+ years (54/377) received the vaccine, with an overall HZ vaccination rate of 10.9%. The primary motivators were healthcare provider recommendations (57.1%) and awareness of benefits (34.9%). Of non-vaccinated individuals, 51.7% expressed willingness to vaccinate if barriers were removed, while 48.3% remained unwilling. The main barrier was a lack of awareness (41.9%). Vaccination rates were significantly higher among residents of the eastern region (26.5%, p = 0.001), those aged 60+ years (25.6%, p = 0.001), and urban residents (12.6%, p = 0.004). Among the non-vaccinated, willingness to vaccinate was higher among individuals from the southern region (64.3%, p = 0.001), aged 30-49 years (53.8%, p = 0.001), urban dwellers (52.3%, p = 0.004), highly educated (56.4%, p = 0.020), recipients of other vaccines (57.7%, p = 0.001), and those with prior shingles diagnoses (57.9%, p = 0.006).

conclusionHZ vaccination remains underutilized in Saudi Arabia despite moderate awareness levels. Healthcare provider recommendations, public education, and system-level interventions are critical to improving uptake. National strategies must address disparities in access, knowledge, and provider engagement to enhance preventive healthcare outcomes for at-risk populations.

Indexed as

healthcare systemsherpes zoster viruspublic health policysaudi arabiashingles vaccine

Identifiers

PMID40937227
PMCPMC12422532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.