ArticleCureus2025
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Treating Closed Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults Using a Functional Brace.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis was a prospective case series to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of treating closed humeral shaft fractures in adults using a functional brace.
methodsTwelve adult patients (mean age: 36 years; range: 16-70 years) with closed humeral shaft fractures meeting the inclusion criteria were initially managed with a U-shaped slab for two weeks, followed by a functional brace until radiological union was achieved. Clinical and radiological assessments were conducted weekly during the first month post-bracing, and biweekly thereafter until union. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Hunter's criteria. Shoulder and elbow functions were assessed using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), respectively. The shoulder and elbow range of motion (ROM) was measured at final follow-up. Radiological alignment was assessed in the coronal and sagittal planes at initial presentation and at the end of treatment.
resultsAll 12 fractures (100%) achieved union at a mean of 10 weeks (range: 7-12 weeks). According to Hunter's criteria, eight patients (66.7%) had excellent outcomes (Grade V), and three patients (25%) had very good outcomes (Grade IV). The mean CMS was 91.8, with nine (75%) patients scoring above 90. The mean MEPS was 96.2. Final angular displacement averaged 5.6° in the coronal plane and 1.5° in the sagittal plane. Spontaneous correction of displacement was observed without manipulation. No significant correlation was found between final angular displacement and functional outcomes (p > 0.05).
conclusionFunctional bracing for closed humeral shaft fractures in adults results in a high union rate and excellent clinical and radiological outcomes. It is a safe and effective treatment option for this injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.