ReviewInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2025
Advancements in the Treatment of Necrotizing Otitis Externa with Hyperbaric Oxygen: A Systematic Review.
Review in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Necrotizing otitis externa (NOE), also known as Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as an adjunctive treatment for NOE, focusing on clinical outcomes and the potential benefits in refractory or advanced cases. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search on the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for articles published from January 1980 to December 2023. The search terms included Results: The results indicate that HBOT shows promise in the treatment of NOE, with several studies reporting complete resolution of infection and prevention of recurrence, especially in refractory cases. Conclusion: The current evidence is insufficient to establish HBOT as a standard treatment for NOE; however, its potential benefits in improving clinical outcomes and reducing morbidity are significant. High-quality research, including randomized controlled trials, is necessary to validate the role of HBOT in NOE treatment. Where hyperbaric facilities are accessible, HBOT should be considered for refractory NOE cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.