Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937087›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Smokers present a three times higher risk of graft failure after ACL reconstruction: A single-centre retrospective analysis.

Filip R Hendrikx, Pietro Conte, Annemieke Van Haver, Kristien Vuylsteke, Koen Carl Lagae, Peter Verdonk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Filip R HendrikxORTHOCA Antwerp Belgium.
Pietro ConteORTHOCA Antwerp Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5425-0652
Annemieke Van HaverORTHOCA Antwerp Belgium.
Kristien VuylstekeORTHOCA Antwerp Belgium.
Koen Carl LagaeORTHOCA Antwerp Belgium.
Peter VerdonkORTHOCA Antwerp Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether patients actively smoking at the time of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have higher failure rates, defined as the need for revision ACLR procedures over time, compared to non-smokers. Methods: This was a retrospective evaluation on a single-centre cohort of patients who underwent primary ACLR between 2010 and 2015. Patients were included if they had a minimum follow-up of two years and were classified according to their smoking status at the time of the surgery. The primary outcome was graft failure, defined as the need for revision ACLR surgery due to symptomatic ACL instability. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed on patient groups known to be at high risk of ACLR failure. Results: The cohort consisted of 537 patients, including 96 (18%) smokers and 441 (82%) non-smokers, with a mean follow-up of 56 months (range 24-89). Demographic characteristics were similar between smokers and non-smokers at baseline. Overall, 22 patients (4.1%) underwent revision ACLR. The failure rate was significantly higher in smokers (9.4%, 9/96) compared to non-smokers (2.9%, 13/441) ( Conclusions: Smoking at the time of ACLR was associated with a threefold increased risk of ACLR failure. The ACLR failure risk was even greater in patients under 25 years of age, male and those participating in high-activity sports. Notably, a failure rate of 31% was observed in smokers under 25 years of age. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series with no comparison group.

Indexed as

ACLfailurekneerisk factorsmoketobacco

Identifiers

PMID40937087
PMCPMC12421139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.