ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Tertiary referral for double balloon enteroscopy in small bowel Crohn's disease: a retrospective assessment of diagnostic impact.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing isolated small bowel Crohn's disease (CD) can be challenging, as symptoms, imaging, and capsule endoscopy (CE) can mimic other diseases. Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) directly evaluates the small bowel. We describe the impact of tertiary referral for DBE in patients with known or suspected small bowel CD. Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of a single tertiary-center DBE database from February 2009 to May 2013. Patients referred for DBE for known or suspected small bowel CD, based on CE, imaging and/or symptoms were included. The primary outcome was the change in diagnosis and/or management after referral for DBE. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 108 patients were included, 10 with established CD and 98 with suspected/rule-out CD. DBE changed management in 8/10 patients with known CD. In patients with suspected CD, the diagnosis was confirmed in 39/98 (40%), and management was changed in 32 of those 39 (82%). An alternative diagnosis was made or CD was ruled out in 59/98 (60%) patients with suspected CD. Prior to DBE, starting CD therapy was recommended in 24/98 (25%) patients, but DBE confirmed CD in only 15 of those 24 (63%). Conclusions: Tertiary referral for DBE in suspected CD confined to the small bowel is valuable for investigating the findings from noninvasive testing, such as CE or imaging. DBE can guide CD management and establish accurate diagnoses. Physicians should consider DBE when the diagnosis of isolated small bowel CD is not confirmed by histology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.