Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937059›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

Effectiveness of upadacitinib in ulcerative colitis patients with prior tofacitinib exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fariha Hasan, Ayesha Liaquat, Ahmed Raza, Zain Ali Nadeem, Fatima Farooqi, Hassam Ali, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Zeina Issa, Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam, Saqr Alsakarneh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fariha HasanCooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA (Fariha Hasan).
Ayesha LiaquatDow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan (Ayesha Liaquat, Fatima Farooqi).
Ahmed RazaServices Institute of Medical Sciences, Pakistan (Ahmed Raza).
Zain Ali NadeemAllama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan (Zain Ali Nadeem).
Fatima FarooqiDow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan (Ayesha Liaquat, Fatima Farooqi).
Hassam AliECU Health, Greenville, NC, USA (Hassam Ali).
Dushyant Singh DahiyaUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA (Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam).
Zeina IssaECU Health, Greenville, NC, USA (Hassam Ali).
Bhanu Siva Mohan PinnamUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA (Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam).
Saqr AlsakarnehDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA (Saqr Alsakarneh).
Islam MohamadDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA (Islam Mohamad).
Gursimran S KoccharDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (Gursimran S. Kocchar).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is a recently approved therapy for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Limited data are available on its efficacy in patients previously exposed to tofacitinib, a non-selective JAK inhibitor. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib in UC patients with prior tofacitinib treatment. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were queried for studies evaluating the effectiveness of upadacitinib in UC patients with prior tofacitinib treatment. Primary outcomes included clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR), and clinical response. Secondary outcomes were the mean decrease in fecal calprotectin, and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using R, calculating pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences with 95%CI for continuous outcomes using a random-effects model. Results: Five studies, with 127 patients, were included in the final analysis. Upadacitinib increased pooled clinical remission rates by 57% (95%CI 0.32-0.80), SFCR rates by 52% (95%CI 0.26-0.78), and clinical response rates by 75% (95%CI 0.44-0.96). Upadacitinib reduced mean fecal calprotectin levels by 597.59% (95%CI 350.94-844.324). Adverse events, such as headache, acne vulgaris, rash, nasopharyngitis and infections, were reported in 34% of patients (95%CI 0.11-0.62). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicates that upadacitinib may be an effective treatment for patients with prior tofacitinib exposure, demonstrating significant clinical remission, SFCR, and clinical response. Larger clinical trials are needed to establish long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

inflammatory bowel diseasetofacitinibulcerative colitisUpadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID40937059
PMCPMC12421357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.