ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Effectiveness of upadacitinib in ulcerative colitis patients with prior tofacitinib exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upadacitinib Outcomes After Tofacitinib Failure in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and VTE in Patients with IBD Taking Anti-TNF versus JAK Inhibitors: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is a recently approved therapy for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Limited data are available on its efficacy in patients previously exposed to tofacitinib, a non-selective JAK inhibitor. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib in UC patients with prior tofacitinib treatment. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were queried for studies evaluating the effectiveness of upadacitinib in UC patients with prior tofacitinib treatment. Primary outcomes included clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR), and clinical response. Secondary outcomes were the mean decrease in fecal calprotectin, and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using R, calculating pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences with 95%CI for continuous outcomes using a random-effects model. Results: Five studies, with 127 patients, were included in the final analysis. Upadacitinib increased pooled clinical remission rates by 57% (95%CI 0.32-0.80), SFCR rates by 52% (95%CI 0.26-0.78), and clinical response rates by 75% (95%CI 0.44-0.96). Upadacitinib reduced mean fecal calprotectin levels by 597.59% (95%CI 350.94-844.324). Adverse events, such as headache, acne vulgaris, rash, nasopharyngitis and infections, were reported in 34% of patients (95%CI 0.11-0.62). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicates that upadacitinib may be an effective treatment for patients with prior tofacitinib exposure, demonstrating significant clinical remission, SFCR, and clinical response. Larger clinical trials are needed to establish long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.