Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40937045›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Computerized-assisted technology of virtual reality on memory in people with Williams syndrome.

Ching-Fen Hsu, Qian Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ching-Fen HsuSchool of Foreign Languages and Literature, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qian JiangLaboratory for Language Pathology and Developmental Neurosciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with Williams syndrome (WS) have strong verbal short-term memory but challenged verbal long-term memory given their advantageous lexical semantics. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the memory of people with WS using virtual reality (VR) to determine the root of challenges associated with virtual navigation. Methods: People with WS ( Results: Based on the shopping task, if a participant did not follow the instructions and/or target list, an error was recorded and reported using the software. People with WS shopped the longest and erred the most. The CA group shopped longer and erred more than the MA group; the 5th graders were similar to the CS group. People with WS replaced and confused more than controls. Further analyses revealed atypical processing of the semantic features of the target items in people with WS. As control groups, the practice effect emerged through pause time and duration in people with WS. Conclusion: The findings revealed that people with WS show bizarre lexical semantic knowledge, which may be an influential factor in impaired long-term memory and sentence comprehension. The practice effect seems to be an important factor in the rehabilitation potential of people with WS. Implications: VR technology could be a promising tool for assessing memory and cognitive abilities in people with WS. With computerized-assisted technological advancements in training, people with WS can improve their long-term memory and sentence comprehension abilities with a specific design and aim for the target issue.

Indexed as

lexical semanticslong-term memoryrehabilitation potentialvirtual realityWilliams syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40937045
PMCPMC12421776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.