ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research
Introducing the Professionalism Mini-evaluation Exercise in Undergraduate Medical Training in India: A Validity and Feasibility Study.
Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) has demonstrated valid evidence in assessing the construct, professionalism, in resident training. As the Indian medical regulatory body has introduced "professional" as one of the seven roles of Indian Medical Graduate and as cultural and social differences affect professionalism of students' cohort across geographical regions, this study was undertaken to establish P-MEX's validity, reliability, and feasibility in assessing the construct, professionalism, in undergraduate medical students (UMSs) in India. Materials and Methods: This multicentric study assessed the final phase-2 (5 Results: The item mean score for the 697 collected P-MEX questionnaires ranged from 2.57 to 3.24 out of 4. EFA conducted using principal component analysis with item-component loading of 0.5 and above with Varimax rotation gave a 5-factor, 21-item solution. However, the CFA suggested a 4-factor, 18-item solution which was then confirmed by a rerun of the CFA. Conclusion: The CFA suggests that the 18-item, 4-factor questionnaire is a good fit solution for assessing the construct, professionalism, in UMSs in Indian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.