Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936977›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2025

Role of triage audit in an ongoing differentiated TB care initiative to reduce deaths in Tamil Nadu, India.

A Jeyakumar, S Kalaiselvi, D Nair, R Vijayaprabha, D Kabir, J M Melfha, T Bhatnagar, R Srinivasan, K Gayathri, K Boopathi and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

A JeyakumarICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
S KalaiselviAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Madurai, India.
D NairICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
R VijayaprabhaICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
D KabirICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
J M MelfhaICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
T BhatnagarICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
R SrinivasanICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
K GayathriICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
K BoopathiICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
R S VamanDistrict Hospital, Kasaragod, Kasaragod, India.
V RajanICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
S ShanmugasundaramICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
A FrederickDirectorate of Medical and Rural Health Services, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India.
H D ShewadeICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the ongoing India's first state-wide differentiated TB care programme in Tamil Nadu (TN-KET), adults diagnosed with drug-sensitive TB at public facilities undergo triage. The adults with severe undernutrition, respiratory insufficiency, or poor performance status are prioritised for comprehensive assessment and inpatient care. Although the programme met triage coverage targets, 11 districts failed to achieve the goal of a 30% reduction in TB death rates. This study compares aggregate triage coverage with actual coverage and evaluates the quality of programme-reported triaging data against an investigator-led audit (repeat assessments in the field) within a few weeks of diagnosis.

designAn ecological study using routine programme data (April 2022-June 2024) was conducted for the first objective, and a cross-sectional analytical study with primary and secondary data (August 2024-February 2025) was performed for the triage audit.

resultsAmong 48,905 adults with drug-sensitive TB notified, the true triage coverage was 84% against the reported triage coverage of 113%. The triage audit showed 35.7% were triage-positive, compared with 27.6% through TB SeWA (Severe TB Web Application). The mean weight and body mass index from the audit were 0.82 kg and 0.63 kg/m

conclusionThe districts need to address inadequate triage coverage and suboptimal quality of triaging.

Indexed as

Indiaquality improvementseverely illSORT ITtriage audittuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID40936977
PMCPMC12421824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.